Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Protein diagrams

 I am an aficionado of proteins.  I am made of proteins.  An undergraduate course in Biochemistry opened my eyes to the simplicity and wonder of the grand "central dogma" of biology: proteins do all the work; DNA is the blueprints for proteins.   Four classes of "macro molecules" (giant molecules, made of smaller modules that are, in most cases, molecules themselves) are the building materials (so to speak) from which living organisms are constructed.  The pattern is the same for every kingdom (or domain) of life: plants, bacteria, protozoa, animals, fungi---all are systems of these four kinds of macromolecules operating through processes according to similar or identical principles.  Early on, it occurred to me at the time that macromolecules are pretty easy to understand; I wonder whether my students have found this to be the case.  Did my approach succeed?   Did it fail miserably?    

 

Macromolecules of three of the four kinds are chain polymers, snapped together like "pop-beads" or perhaps one-dimensional legos.  Wonder of wonders!   Proteins and Nucleic Acids (DNA and RNA) are never branched; some carbohydrates are branched, or form interconnected chains and sheets.  The  entirety of living  existence and functions is based upon the motif of linear sequences.  

Many of my students did not come pre-supplied with the knowledge of   existence of atoms as the building blocks of molecules; now had they heard the news that all things are made of atoms and molecules.   New foundations must be provided: I told the story of how my mother told me one day to look around me: everything my eyes could see, she told me, was made of a small number of kinds of atoms.  This made a big impression on me.  This and Natural Selection formed the foundation of everything.  Do I think it thesel concepts held an equal weight in the lives of my student?  The jury is still out.  I'll be happy to learn that they did, even for a few.  I know of a very small number.  (What then of everyone else?  I can and do hope they picked up the important threads, even some of them, along this journey.)  

We (I, I mean) then started constructing a model of a living organism as---not a mechanism, but---understandable as a system, at some level,  of macromolecules.  It had to start from the beginning,   I dare say that a few  of my students received these pieces of the puzzle enthusiastically.  

Proteins are central.  

 Life is, at some level, a system of Proteins interacting among themselves and Nucleic Acids (which carry the blueprint for their production), fueled by Carbohydrates, constrained within membranes made of Lipids (fats and oils, which also store energy and serve other functions.).  Life is, of course,  far more complicated than this; but this truly is the core idea of life; it serves as an important way of understanding of living processes, of functioning organisms.  Proteins are the prime actors;  important structural components; and the most important actuating principles in all living things.   Every living organism (with a few interesting exception) is made of cells.  Proteins are the essential components of the functioning cell. 

 The following is a short list of some kinds of proteins in a living organism, from the simplest to the most complex.

  • Enzymes: catalysts of chemical reactions.  Digestive enzymes like Amylase, which breaks starch---bundles of sugars that cells cannot use as fuel---apart into into sugars, which are small, and easily imported by the cell.  Other enzymes build proteins from Amino Acid (under direction by DNA).  Enzymes repair damaged components of cells; other enzymes break down proteins that are no longer useful.  Enzymes regulate chemistry in the cell.
  • Action proteins: muscle, flagella, cilia all operate through the agency of proteins.  
  • Transport: Motor proteins carry packets of other molecules (many of them proteins) around in the cell.  Hemoglobin carries Oxygen. 
  • Antibodies function to defend cells from invasion.
  • Structural protein: hair, keratin, nails, claws, barbs and arrowheads, protective spines, the "cytoskeleton" that provides structural support to cells.  .
  • Venoms and toxins are, in many cases, proteins.
  • Proteins in cell membranes regulate the movement of materials in and out of the cell.  Some of these are critical to the operation of the nervous system.
  • Signalling proteins: 
    • Hormones (insulin, for example) secreted from cells in one organ of an organism act as messages to other organs. 
    • Neurotransmitters are proteins that, when secreted by one neuron, trigger an impulse in the next neuron.
    •  Pheromones are similar to hormones; however, these are chemical messages that, when secreted by one organism, are understand by other indivisuals.  For example,  cats mark territories (and their humans) with scents.  Female moths secrete sex pheromones, mating signals, that are recognized by males even miles away; female dogs famously signal they are in "heat" through scents that draw males in a neigborhood.  Alarm pheromones are secreted by organisms to warn of danger.  Ants mark their trails with trail pheromones.    

 

Protein structure determines protein function 

A protein  is a chain of one of about 20 Amino Acids in a very specific order determined by the DNA that codes for it.  Each of these Amino Acid has unique properties.  Some are charged, either + or -.  Some love water (are hydrophilic),  and others abhor water (are hydrophobic).  These and other properties of Amino Acids cause the chain to fold upon itself in certain ways.  Imagine a giant spaghetti monster made up of one extremely long strand of spaghetti, a chain of Amino Acids with different properties that cause certain links in this chain to attract or repel one another, or fold away from the water inside the cell, or to embrace it.  In the end, the strand of spaghetti folds into a precisely determined shape, it's structure.  The shape of this blob of spaghetti determines it's function.  Structure determines  function.   Imagine, perhaps, this strand of spaghetti has tiny magnets at precise locations along its length.  Some magnets are negative, and others positive.  When the spaghetti folds into a blog, the magnets help to direct specific parts of the strand to pair, or repel one another.  Some parts of the spaghetti may have tiny bits of fat precisely located along the strand, that cause the spaghetti to fold (in a water medium, like the cell) inward, away from water.  These are other forces determine the shape of a protein.   If the position of one of the magnets is changed by a tiny amount, this can alter the structure---the shape---of the resulting blob.  Such a protein would fail to function efficiently.

 Remarkably, this is exactly how it all works.  Thousands of blobs of spaghetti shaped each in it's own unique way, interact with one another.  A digestive enzyme may break starch---chains of sugars---by breaking these sugars apart.  The enzyme to break the starch chain has a pocket that precisely fits a starch molecule in a specific configuration, between two sugars, the sub-molecules of that starch chain.  The bond between these two sugars is now placed under stress and weakened, and caused to break.   If even one of the Amino Acids making up this chain were changed, say from positively charged to neutral, the shape would lose its integrity; the enzyme (amylase, in this instance) would not operate at peak efficiency., or perhaps fail to work at all.   

Each protein achieves its function through the precise ordering of its Amino Acid components, which determines the manner in which the chain folds into it's 3-dimensional structure.  DNA is a chain 4 sub-molecules, Nucleotides, in a specific order.  This order providing  the code for the Amino Acid sequence in a proteins is a gene.  

 

======================================= 

 

Today I want to look at diagrams that have been devised to help us see and understand the structures of proteins.  Structure Diagrams, .   protein is a straight chain of amino acids. 

Proteins, after all, attain every aspect of their functions from their shapes.  Their shapes are written in a linear code.  

At Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) I observed a poster wrapped around a column,  touting that the shapes of over 8,000 proteins had been characterized at that facility.  

 

8,714 Proteins.  A Poster in the Advanced Light Source of LBNL.

 

 

 

Close up showing protein structure diagrams.  

The double helices are proteins!




Today I decided to dive into the  dark waters of these diagrams, that I have never understood.    I discovered something wonderful: A Wikipedia guide to proteins structure diagrams!  Put a pin in that.  I also stumbled upon an article about the LBNL Advanced Light Source, written in April 2025:

 Today, the nine structural biology beamlines at the ALS passed a major milestone of collectively depositing over 10,000 protein structures into the Protein Data Bank (PDB), a worldwide, open-access repository of protein structures. 

 

WOW!

Here, then, is a link to the Wikipedia Page about Ribbon Diagrams.

On this page I learned about early ribbon diagrams, hand drawn by Jane Richardson, such as this one.  

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/TriosePhosphateIsomerase_Ribbon_pastel_photo_mat.png
Triose P isomerase monomer

 

 

 

Here is another one:  A Prealbumin Dimer:

 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/PrealbuminDimer_ribbon.jpg

 

=================================== 

The following is different kind of model, a space filling model: an animation of Salivary Amylase breaking the bond between sugars in a starch chain.  Shown is  it's active pocket.  Starch nestles into the pocket, is broken apart by the enzyme, and is spit out in two parts.  Click in the lower right hand corner to enlarge it.  This is a different form of model, a space filling model.  Note the attribution.  My profound gratitude for the enormous amount of work that went into this.

Starch hydrolysis by amylase by svt4ever on Sketchfab

 

Salivary amylase is secreted by our salivary glands as seen as it detects the presence of starch, for example after eating a donut in the morning.  Right away the starch---which is a chain of sugars, albeit not a simple linear chain---begins breaking the starch down.  This process continues as the donut moves through our digestive system, by other forms of amylase.  

 

 

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

The Horror Story of the Ocean SUV EV: a story with a heart-warming outcome. Or, why we need more regulation.

 The company Fisker sold an SUV, the Ocean.  When they went bankrupt, they left the owners high and dry.   Owners, in can-do manner, formed a partnership and reverse engineered the code and the keyfobs, and wrote an open source replacement.  This is a great story.  It also is a terrible story.  What happened to the criminal who were let off the hook through bankruptcy.  

 The Stooges (not the three stooges) abhor regulation.  But would regulations protect the little guys from corporate outlaws like Fisker?  Here's a link to the story on Slashdot:

 

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/05/16/2318249/how-owners-of-evs-from-bankrupt-fisker-saved-their-cars-with-an-open-source-nonprofit 

 

 

Saturday, December 27, 2025

Chaos is unfolding at warp speed: profit drives us over the cliff.

 Radical new technologies assaulting the senses.  Promises of profit and even better life styles.  

 As a reminder, technologies like self-driving cars, automation, and robots, as mere examples, were designed by humans.  We do not have a good track record.  

 Unforeseen consequences are inevitable.  The human brain evolved to solve problems.  These problems were solved incrementally.  An example of incremental "progress' is science; another one is technology.  The nuclear reactor was not designed in one step.  Accidents have resulted in improvements.  But the assertion by those in Japan who say that the lessons of Fukushima have been learned fails to recognize the inability of the human brain to see the whole picture.  Other errors will inevitably creep in.  

Waymo has had to reprogram self-driving  vehicles after a power outage in San Francisco, because humans who wrote the programs did not foresee this inevitability.

 AI?  AI was designed by humans.  Is it possible for us to design something more perfect than ourselves?  

  

Monday, November 3, 2025

News about the Internet Archive: the cost of principled legal defense

 https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/11/03/1930232/internet-archives-legal-fights-are-over-but-its-founder-mourns-what-was-lost

 

 The Internet Archive celebrated archiving its trillionth webpage last month and received congratulations from San Francisco, which declared October 22 "Internet Archive Day." Senator Alex Padilla designated the nonprofit a federal depository library. The organization currently faces no major lawsuits and no active threats to its collections. But these victories arrived after years of bruising copyright battles that forced the removal of more than 500,000 books from the Archive's Open Library. "We survived, but it wiped out the Library," founder Brewster Kahle told ArsTechnica.

 

 

Monday, September 29, 2025

Watching the ice melt? Not so much.

Since this blog doesn't  have a huge following, this is a bookmark for me.  I keep my eye on the arctic and antarctic.  The heat balance of Earth follows the difference between incoming energy---sunlight---and outgoing energy---radiation.  Greenhouse gases---Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and even water vapor, among others---block energy from leaving the planet. The more greenhouse gases, the less energy (ultimately, head) leaves the planet.  Since energy loss is less than energy income, the result is accumulation of heat.  

The specific heat of a substance is a measure of the amount of heat required to warm up 1 gram of the material by 1 degree Centigrade.  The specific heat of liquid water is 1 calorie per gram per degree C.  As the heat entering the Oceans increases, the temperature elevates, in obedience to this formula.  

 The specific heat does not reflect the amount of heat required to change the phase of, for example, water.  To evaporate one gram of water requires 540 calories of heat, with no change in temperature; this is called the heat of vaporization.   So it takes 540 times the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of a gram of water by 1 degree C,  Don't forget, no temperature change occurs during this change from water to steam.

 To melt a 1 gram ice cube requires 80 Calories.  Again, there is no change in temperature; the water just changes from a solid to a liquid phase.  This amount, 80 Calories, is called the heat of fusion.  (Removal of the same amount of heat would result in changing our gram of water to a gram of ice, again with no change of temperature.

Water has an extremely high Specific Heat.  It is partly for this reason that Earth is particularly suited for life.  On other planets, where the average temperatures are either much higher or much lower,  liquid water is not so readily available for life, for cells, for fish to swim in...   

 Our home planet fortunately dwells in the "Goldilocks Zone."   It is not too hot; not too cold; but just right.  Our ranges of temperatures, across the geography of Earth, allow the heat of fusion (melting) and vaporization (condensation) to regulate the temperatures within a limited range of temperatures that is just right.  

 Existence of polar ice provides a buffer when the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing heat.  In times when outgoing heat exceeds the incoming energy, the poles grow; our planet has experienced times of extreme cold, when ice covered a significant portion of Earth's surface.  

 Fortunately, Greenhouse Gases form a barrier that regulates, in a way, the heat loss to space.  Earth's levels of Carbon Dioxide may have been around 4,000 ppm.  More recently, those levels have stabilized; but this graph from Earth.org, a version of the "hockey stick: graph, shows those levels increasing dramatically.

 

Robust CO2 data from ice cores covering the last 800,000 years.

 

What has changed?  We can start with the Industrial Revolution, and more recently the massive scale of burning of fossil petroleum to fuel planes, trains, and automobiles, as well as to generate our electricity.  Carbon Dioxide was drawn from the atmosphere to build living systems; as living things died, they left fossils, some of them in liquid form as hydrocarbons---petroleum---that we now have been drawing to burn in service of our industrial economy.  That old Carbon, in the form of degraded biological molecules, is being returned to an inorganic, prehistoric form through our agency.  The huge increase of CO2 is Anthropogenic---generated by humans.  

 Fortunately for us, so far, the worse effects of the build-up of CO2 have been mitigated by the existence of ice at the North and South poles.  Melting of this ice absorbs a huge amount of heat; this happens without temperature change.  It is our salvation.  


Sure, earth's atmosphere and oceans are warming, but once this ice is drastically reduced, the capacity for mitigation of effects of huge heat influx will be dramatically reduced.  


This is why we watch the ice.  Irresponsible actions born of ignorance have now resulted in the loss of one of the monitors of  the arctic.  Link below.   


https://grist.org/politics/after-trump-cut-the-national-science-foundation-by-56-percent-a-venerable-arctic-research-center-closes-its-doors/